| Home |
If you have a new
article concerning biblical errancy (either for or against), or you
would
like to respond to a published article in a more formal format than the
feedback area allows,
please submit
it *. Articles in html coding are
preferred, but if you are unfamiliar with this format, you may submit in
other formats. We will make every reasonable attempt
to ensure that the
formatting you intend is what is actually seen, but at the same time
keeping a common look among
all articles. If you know html, I'd really appreciate submissions with
the appropriate tags already
in place. That, however, is not necessary, but it will help to get it
posted quicker. Articles that you submit should be your own original
work.
If a submitted article is deemed off topic to biblical errancy and is therefore not published on The Skeptical Review, it may be published in our alternate section. Articles in this alternate section will not be linked to feedback forums, so if you want reader feedback remember to include your email address in the article itself. |
|
| Farrell Till Updated 05/09/06 |
Richard Carrier Updated 01/05/05 |
J.E. Hill Updated 1/10/06 |
Richard DellaValle Updated 5/4/03 |
John Kesler Updated 12/18/02 |
Roger Hutchinson Updated 5/17/03 |
| Nancy Todd Updated 03/14/03 |
Brett Palmer Updated 11/17/05 |
|
|
|
*All documents submitted become the property of The Skeptical Review for publishing purposes only (in other words, once you send it to us, we have the unlimited right to publish it on this site), but authors retain their individual rights and may have the article published in any other media. No compensation is offered for any articles submitted to The Skeptical Review.
The fact that an article is published at this site does not imply that Farrell Till agrees with everything said in the article, and he is not obligated to reply to objections to issues raised in those articles that he didn't write. He may reply if the issues are of sufficient interest to him (and if he has the time), but authors must be able to defend their own arguments.