THE AUTHORS

Home

Debates Index

If you have a new article concerning biblical errancy (either for or against), or you would like to respond to a published article in a more formal format than the feedback area allows, please submit it *. Articles in html coding are preferred, but if you are unfamiliar with this format, you may submit in other formats. We will make every reasonable attempt to ensure that the formatting you intend is what is actually seen, but at the same time keeping a common look among all articles. If you know html, I'd really appreciate submissions with the appropriate tags already in place. That, however, is not necessary, but it will help to get it posted quicker. Articles that you submit should be your own original work.

If a submitted article is deemed off topic to biblical errancy and is therefore not published on The Skeptical Review, it may be published in our alternate section. Articles in this alternate section will not be linked to feedback forums, so if you want reader feedback remember to include your email address in the article itself.


Post your comments about articles, debates, or any biblical errancy issue here.

Farrell Till
Updated 05/09/06
Richard Carrier
Updated 01/05/05
J.E. Hill
Updated 1/10/06
Richard DellaValle
Updated 5/4/03
John Kesler
Updated 12/18/02
Roger Hutchinson
Updated 5/17/03
Nancy Todd
Updated 03/14/03
Brett Palmer
Updated 11/17/05



*All documents submitted become the property of The Skeptical Review for publishing purposes only (in other words, once you send it to us, we have the unlimited right to publish it on this site), but authors retain their individual rights and may have the article published in any other media. No compensation is offered for any articles submitted to The Skeptical Review.

The fact that an article is published at this site does not imply that Farrell Till agrees with everything said in the article, and he is not obligated to reply to objections to issues raised in those articles that he didn't write. He may reply if the issues are of sufficient interest to him (and if he has the time), but authors must be able to defend their own arguments.